Daylight Illumination and Building Architecture - Effect at Workplace
Keywords:Daylight, Architecture, Technology, Indoor Work, Human Resource, Workplace Behaviour
Occupational health and architecture on the modern office-based work environment is a major public health concern of this era. Information and communication technology have created a world where a high-quality working environment is vital for the office workers. Majority of the nation provide quantity rather than quality of work conditions. According to the researcher’s poor indoor environmental quality, such as illumination, has a detrimental influence on human health and performance. The purpose of this study is to discuss about the effect of day light illumination on worker productivity. This paper has analyzed previous researches and have directed for future research. This study also shows that an adverse day light condition has a negative impact on workers' health and resulting adverse effect on productivity and efficiency. They are also at risk of contracting occupational ailments. Proper day light illumination is advisable which is a necessity for both employee and employer.
Bhusal, P., Tetri, E., & Halonen, L. (2006, November). Quality and efficiency of office lighting. In 27th International AIVC Conference (pp. 20-22).
Boubekri, M., Cheung, I. N., Reid, K. J., Wang, C. H., & Zee, P. C. (2014). Impact of windows and daylight exposure on overall health and sleep quality of office workers: a case-control pilot study. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 10(6), 603-611.
Boyce, P., Veitch, J. A., Newsham, G. R., Myer, M., Hunter, C., Heerwagen, J. H., & Jones, C. C. (2003). Lighting quality and office work: A field simulation study. LightingResearch and Technology.
Escuyer, S., & Fontoynont, M. (2001). Lighting controls: a field study of office workers’ reactions. Lighting Research & Technology, 33(2), 77-94.
Festenstein, M., & Keeler, N. (2018). Well-Being in the Workplace.
Flynn, J. E., Hendrick, C., Spencer, T., & Martyniuk, O. (1979). A guide to methodology procedures for measuring subjective impressions in lighting. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society,8(2), 95-110.
Harb, F., Hidalgo, M. P., & Martau, B. (2015). Lack of exposure to natural light in the workspace is associated with physiological, sleep and depressive symptoms. Chronobiology international, 32(3), 368-375. DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2014.982757
Jones, C. C., & Gordon, K. L. (2004). Efficient Lighting Design and Office Worker Productivity (No. PNNL-SA-42858). Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States).
Katabaro, J. M., & Yan, Y. (2019). Effects of lighting quality on working efficiency of workers in office building in Tanzania. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2019.
Kruisselbrink, T., Dangol, R., &Rosemann, A. (2018). Photometric measurements of lighting quality: An overview. Building and Environment,138, 42-52.
Lacroix, R. N., Stamatiou, E., & Planner, A. D. T. (2007). Green architecture and sustainable development: Applications & perspectives. In Proc. of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS Int. Conference on Energy, Environment, Ecosystems and Sustainable Development (pp. 603-606).
Lehar, M. A., & Glicksman, L. R. (2007). Rapid algorithm for modeling daylight distributions in office buildings. Building and Environment, 42(8), 2908-2919.
Lok, R., Smolders, K. C., Beersma, D. G., & de Kort, Y. A. (2018). Light, alertness, and alerting effects of white light: a literature overview. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 33(6), 589-601.
Moore, T., Carter, D. J., & Slater, A. I. (2003). A qualitative study of occupant-controlled office lighting. Lighting Research & Technology, 35(4), 297-314.
Pauley, S. M. (2004). Lighting for the human circadian clock: recent research indicates that lighting has become a public health issue. Medical Hypotheses, 63(4), 588-596.
Rea, M. S., & Ouellette, M. J. (1991). Relativevisual performance: A basis for application. Lighting Research & Technology, 23(3), 135-144.
Sardinsky, R., & Benya, J. (2003). Super T8s: Super Lamps, Super Ballasts. Report ER-03-16. Boulder, Colo.: Platt’s Research and Consulting.
Silvester, J., & Konstantinou, E. (2010). Lighting, well-being and work performance: A review of the literature.
Soto Magán, V. E., & Andersen, M. (2019). How to Assess Alerting Effects of Daylight at theWorkplace? Learnings from Semi-Controlled Studies (No. CONF, pp. 227-240).
ul Haq, M. A., Hassan, M. Y., Abdullah, H., Rahman, H. A., Abdullah, M. P., Hussin, F., & Said, D. M. (2014). A review on lighting control technologies in commercial buildings, their performance and affecting factors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 268-279.
United States Environmental Protection Agency(1991). Indoor Air Facts No. 4 (revised) Sick
building syndrome. Air and Radiation (6609J).http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/sbs.html
Van Bommel, W. J. (2006). Non-visual biological effect of lighting and the practical meaning for lighting for work. Applied ergonomics, 37(4), 461-466.
Van Bommel, W. J. M., & Van den Beld, G. J. (2004). Lighting for work: a review of visual and biological effects. Lighting research & technology,36(4), 255-266.
Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (1998). Lighting quality and energy-efficiency effects on task performance, mood, health, satisfaction, and comfort. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 27(1), 107-129.
Wibom, R. I., & Carlsson, L. W. (1987). Work at video display terminals among office employees: visual ergonomics and lighting. In Selected papers from the International Scientific Conference on Work with display units 86 (pp. 357-367).
World Health Organization. (1994). Declaration on occupational health for all: Approved at the second meeting of the who collaborating centres in occupational health, Beijing, China, 11-14 October 1994 (No. WHO/OCH/94.1. Unpublished). World Health Organization.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Asia-Pacific Journal of Management and Technology (AJMT)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.